Green List
Explore

Alto Fragua Indi Wasi Natural National Park
Parque Nacional Natural Alto Fragua Indi Wasi

First Listed

2024

Area
767,00km2

Why is it Green Listed?

Alto Fragua Indi Wasi National Natural Park (PNN AFIW) is one of the 62 protected areas administered by Colombia’s National Natural Parks, declared on February 25 by Resolution No. 198 of 2002. Its declaration was an initiative of the Inga people of Caquetá (Yurayaco, San Miguel, Brisas, Niñeras and Agua Blanca Cozumbe Resguardos), and the declaration resolution recognizes the ancestral nature of the Inga people’s territory.This protected area, along with the Cueva de los Guacharos and Serranía de los Churumbelos Auka Wasi parks, is part of the socio-ecosystemic complex known as GUAFRACHU. The socio-ecosystemic complex is a region located in the Amazonian piedmont, where the eastern mountain range and the Amazonian plain meet. It is characterized by a large supply of water resources, elements of biodiversity, a territory influenced by historical processes (quina and rubber roads), dynamics of use and occupation (Andaquí Territory), and an ethnic-cultural complex. In the area of eastern influence of the Alto Fragua Indi Wasi National Park, there are environmental management plans that contribute to the conservation and recovery of basal forest ecosystems in fluvial-erosional mountains (which are part of the humid tropical Andean-Amazonian piedmont zone): The Amazon Forest Reserve, the Caquetá Soil and Water Conservation District, the Fragua Chorroso watershed under management, the Las Lajas Ecopark, the La Resaca Creek micro-basin protection forest park, and the Andaquíes and Termales de la Quisayá municipal parks. Since the creation of the protected area, progress has been made in the understanding of coordination for the fulfillment of the social function of conservation; thus, the inclusion of the cultural codes of the Inga people in planning and management represents the opportunity to advance in a model of environmental governance of the protected area that is more appropriate for the shared territory, governance that is reflected in: coordination mechanisms, instances to implement joint actions and in inclusive and participatory management strategies where the two authorities can articulate their interests and visions. 

 

Photo Credit – Amazon Conservation Team

Key Achievements

Conservation

  • The results of the ecological integrity analysis for the Subject Values related to Andean Forest in Fluvial-Erosional Mountains, Sub-Andean Forest in Fluvial-Erosional Mountains, and Basal Forest in Fluvial-Erosional Mountains show that for the 76,131 hectares corresponding to the protected area and 77,885 hectares of its zone of geographic influence, 96% of the park’s total extension has very high and high integrity levels. Regarding the type of ecosystem in the PA, the Andean forest in fluvial-erosional mountains has a very high level of integrity; the sub-Andean forest in fluvial-erosional hills and sub-Andean forests in fluvial-erosional mountains have a high level of integrity; basal forest in piedmont hills, basal forest in piedmont valleys, and sub-Andean forest in fluvial-erosional hills are in the very low category.  
  •  Based on the land cover map for the period 2000-2002, with boundaries updated to 2018 and hectares recalculated using geographic information systems, with reference system Origen Único Nacional, reports in 2002 for Alto Fragua Indi Wasi NP 420.5 ha in Pressure condition (0.6% of the total area) and 75,790.1 ha in State condition (99.4% of the total area). Meanwhile, for 2019, it reports 634.6 ha (0.8%) under pressure and 75,576.0 ha (99.2%) in State condition. This data places AFIW NP in SATISFACTORY CONDITION according to the threshold established in the study (Pressure: less than 5%).  
  • Regarding the Preservation – Disturbance indexes, for AFIW NP in the period 2002 to 2019, 75,247.6 hectares (98.7%) are reported in Stable Condition, 92.1 ha (0.1%) in Pressure Condition, 328.4 ha (0.4%) in Recovery Condition, and 542.5 ha (0.7%) in Transformation Condition for the total area of 76,210.6 ha of AFIW NP. This result places AFIW NP in a DESIRABLE SITUATION in the Preservation Index based on the established threshold (Stable State greater than or equal to 95%) (Latorre, Gualdrón and Corredor, 2022). 

Good governance

  • The declaration of the PNN Alto Fragua Indi Wasi was an initiative of the Inga people of Caquetá (Resguardos Yurayaco, San Miguel, Brisas, Niñeras and Agua Blanca Cozumbe), recognizing in the resolution the ancestral nature of their territory. In 2002, the Interadministrative Agreement for the Coordination of the Public Function of Conservation and Management of the PA was signed. Within the framework of this agreement, an annual work plan is agreed upon with the Inga people of Caquetá that contributes to the intercultural management of the PNN, which is made more dynamic with the signing of annual inter-administrative agreements. The aforementioned agreement is in force and has no termination date. It also provides for two (2) coordination bodies called the steering committee and the local committee.  
  •  In the adoption of the update of the planning instrument, in 2019 the prior consultation process with the Inga people of Caquetá was formalized with agreements, for which an action plan was developed to guide and prioritize compliance over five years. In 2023, two (2) inter-administrative agreements were signed within the framework of the public service coordination agreement with the Tandachiridu Inganakuna Indigenous Association to support the implementation of the agreements and their follow-up.  
  •  Since 2005, the Alto Fragua National Park has advanced in the process of social characterization of the families that are partially or totally overlapped with the PA. Under this context, as of 2016, it subscribes transitory agreements of participatory ecological restoration with the peasant community, who develop their own economic activities, which, generates the transformation of areas of dense forest or areas of secondary vegetation for the implementation of transitory, permanent crops or establishment of pastures for livestock activity. As of 2024, there are 201 voluntary restoration agreements, of which 54 are in force. 

Community benefits

  • In the framework of the project “Recovery of governance to address deforestation in protected areas and adjacent areas that are part of the deforestation arc in the departments of Guaviare, Meta, Caquetá and Putumayo” implemented in 2023, (9) economic initiatives of indigenous communities were strengthened, which have been supported by the PA since previous years. These economic initiatives not only contribute to the economy and the recovery of the Inga culture and families, but also to the incorporation of cultural codes into the PA management plan.  
  •  In coordination with the Directorate for the Substitution of Illicit Crops and the Park, the food security component was implemented in 2021 and the productive component in 2022, through short and long cycle projects of the Comprehensive National Program for the Substitution of Illicit Crops (PNIS). Through this program, 115 users related territorially to the PA have benefited, of which 80 have been characterized and have signed transitory agreements for Participative Ecological Restoration.  
  •  As part of the Protected Areas and Peace project aimed at improving the livelihoods of the inhabitants of protected areas and buffer zones by promoting policies that address conflicts over land ownership rights and the sustainable use of natural resources, 31 participatory ecological restoration agreements were signed with farming families, which were strengthened through: a training plan on issues such as ecological restoration, land and environmental management, sustainable systems, non-timber forest products, farmers’ rights, climate change, among others. As a result, 45 cocoa-growing families were trained, 35 families with restoration agreements were trained and 6 monitors were involved. 

Site Attributes

WDPA ID

Size
767,00km2

IUCN Category
II - National Park

Year Established
2002

Marine Protected Area
No

Governance Type
Federal or national ministry or agency

Site Agency
Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia

Site Manager
Angelica Carvajal Rueda

Application
31 Oct 2021

EAGL Evaluation
21 Aug 2024

GL Committee Submission
10 Sep 2022

EAGL Chair
Sandra VALENZUELA

ASI Reviewer
Carlos Escobar

Site Summary

Alto Fragua Indi Wasi National Natural Park (PNN AFIW) is one of the 62 protected areas administered by Colombia’s National Natural Parks, declared on February 25 by Resolution No. 198 of 2002. Its declaration was an initiative of the Inga people of Caquetá (Yurayaco, San Miguel, Brisas, Niñeras and Agua Blanca Cozumbe Resguardos), and the declaration resolution recognizes the ancestral nature of the Inga people’s territory. AFIW PNN has a physical overlap with the Nasa La Esperanza Reserve (70% of the reserve) in the municipality of Belén de los Andaquíes; in the strip between 900 and 1100 masl, there are peasant farmers who live in and use the protected area, some of them with possession and titles since before the declaration of the protected area. The conservation of the Alto Fragua Indi Wasi National Natural Park contributes to the conservation of medicinal plant species, as it is one of the most important natural refuges for the Inga people organized in the TANDA association due to its connectivity and ecosystemic continuity between the Amazon and Andean forests. Since the creation of the protected area, progress has been made in the understanding of coordination for the fulfillment of the social function of conservation; thus, the inclusion of the cultural codes of the Inga people in planning and management represents the opportunity to advance in a model of environmental governance of the protected area that is more appropriate for the shared territory, governance that is reflected in: coordination mechanisms, instances to implement joint actions and in inclusive and participatory management strategies where the two authorities can articulate their interests and visions.

1. Natural Values
MONITORING OF VALUES
THRESHOLDS OF SUCCESS
CONDITION OF VALUES
SUMMARY OF TRENDS AND RESULTS
The Park's Conservation Values are: - Andean forest in fluvio-erosional mountain.
Indicator Variation in the number of natural spatial units by ecosystem, in its attribute, Heterogeneity: There were no changes in the period 2019 - 2022, maintaining the DESIRABLE category. 2) Indicator Variation in the number of fragments of a natural spatial unit, in the attribute Spatial configuration: In the period 2019 - 2022 it is 37.22 in the DESIRABLE category. 3) Indicator Variation in the size of the largest fragment of the spatial unit, in the attribute Spatial configuration: For the period 2019 - 2020 the results show that the largest fragment of natural forest within the NNP decreased in size by -0.17% in T1 and increased by 0.15% for T2 (2019 - 2022), remaining in the DESEABLE range. 4) Indicator Variation in the number of areas transformed by agricultural activities and illicit crops, in the attribute Spatial configuration: For the period 2019 - 2020 it was -20.95 and is in the DESIRABLE category, while Indicator Variation in the number of natural spatial units by ecosystem, in its attribute, Heterogeneity: There were no changes in the period 2019 - 2022, maintaining the DESIRABLE category. 2) Indicator Variation in the number of fragments of a natural spatial unit, in the attribute Spatial configuration: In the period 2019 - 2022 it is 37.22 in the DESIRABLE category. 3) Indicator Variation in the size of the largest fragment of the spatial unit, in the attribute Spatial configuration: For the period 2019 - 2020 the results show that the largest fragment of natural forest within the NNP decreased in size by -0.17% in T1 and increased by 0.15% for T2 (2019 - 2022), remaining in the DESEABLE range. 4) Indicator Variation in the number of areas transformed by agricultural activities and illicit crops, in the attribute Spatial configuration: For the period 2019 - 2020 it was -20.95 and is in the DESIRABLE category, while for the period 2019 - 2022 it was 0.0 in the NOT DESIRABLE category. 5) Indicator Variation of connectivity between fragments of natural spatial units, in the Continuity attribute: For the period 2019 - 2020 it was 31.7 and in Q2 it was 84.9, which is in the DESIRABLE category. 6) Indicator Variation in longitudinal continuity of natural spatial units, in the attribute Continuity: For the period 2019 to 2020 it was 39.41 and for T2 it was 11, it is located in the category NOT DESIRABLE with a tendency to recovery. 7) Indicator Variation in altitudinal continuity between natural spatial units, in the attribute Continuity: The results for this indicator are -23.75 in T1 and -23.7 in T2, it is located in the category NOT DESIRABLE but stable. In general terms, the state of the protected area's natural values is as follows: 1) Andean forest in fluvial erosional mountain: Very High.
In the monitoring program (2021) of land covers, indicators and thresholds were defined: 1) In the Indicator Variation in number of natural spatial units by ecosystems (Andean forest in fluvial erosional mountain, Sub-Andean forest in fluvial erosional mountain and Basal forest in fluvial erosional mountain), in its attribute, Heterogeneity, it is considered Desirable when, it is maintained or increased and Not Desirable when it decreases in relation to the previous period. 2) In the indicator Variation in the number of fragments of a natural spatial unit, in the attribute Spatial configuration, it is considered Desirable when it is maintained or increased and Not Desirable when it decreases in relation to the previous period. 3) In the indicator Variation of the size of the largest fragment of the spatial unit, in the attribute Spatial configuration, it is considered Desirable when the size of the fragment is maintained and increased and Not Desirable when the size of the largest fragment of the natural unit decreases by at least 10%. 4) In the indicator Variation in the number of areas transformed by agricultural activities and illicit crops, in the attribute Spatial configuration, it is considered Desirable when it is maintained or decreased, and Not Desirable when it increases. 5) In the indicator Variation in connectivity between fragments of natural spatial units, for the Continuity attribute, it is considered Desirable if it is positive and Not Desirable when it is negative. 6) In the indicator Variation in the longitudinal continuity of natural spatial units, in the attribute Continuity, it is considered Desirable if it is negative, and Not Desirable when it is positive. 7) The indicator Variation in altitudinal continuity between natural spatial units, in the attribute Continuity, is considered Desirable when it is positive and Not Desirable when it is negative. In the monitoring program (2021) of land covers, indicators and thresholds were defined: 1) In the Indicator Variation in number of natural spatial units by ecosystems (Andean forest in fluvial erosional mountain, Sub-Andean forest in fluvial erosional mountain and Basal forest in fluvial erosional mountain), in its attribute, Heterogeneity, it is considered Desirable when, it is maintained or increased and Not Desirable when it decreases in relation to the previous period. 2) In the indicator Variation in the number of fragments of a natural spatial unit, in the attribute Spatial configuration, it is considered Desirable when it is maintained or increased and Not Desirable when it decreases in relation to the previous period. 3) In the indicator Variation of the size of the largest fragment of the spatial unit, in the attribute Spatial configuration, it is considered Desirable when the size of the fragment is maintained and increased and Not Desirable when the size of the largest fragment of the natural unit decreases by at least 10%. 4) In the indicator Variation in the number of areas transformed by agricultural activities and illicit crops, in the attribute Spatial configuration, it is considered Desirable when it is maintained or decreased, and Not Desirable when it increases. 5) In the indicator Variation in connectivity between fragments of natural spatial units, for the Continuity attribute, it is considered Desirable if it is positive and Not Desirable when it is negative. 6) In the indicator Variation in the longitudinal continuity of natural spatial units, in the attribute Continuity, it is considered Desirable if it is negative, and Not Desirable when it is positive. 7) The indicator Variation in altitudinal continuity between natural spatial units, in the attribute Continuity, is considered Desirable when it is positive and Not Desirable when it is negative.
1) Andean forest in fluvial-erosional mountains: For the analyzed period (2019 - 2022) there are few changes in natural vegetation cover, which maintain high ecological integrity allowing the structure, composition and functionality of the biomes to be dynamic under natural conditions allowing the mobility of biotic components and the flow of energy and nutrients, while at the same time connecting with other protected areas that make up a conservation corridor. 2) Sub-Andean forest in fluvial-erosional mountains: For the period analyzed (2019 - 2022) there are few changes in natural vegetation cover, which maintain
- Sub-Andean forest in fluvio-erosional mountain.
2) Sub-Andean forest in fluvial-erosional mountains: High.
In the monitoring program (2021) of land covers, indicators and thresholds were defined: 1) In the Indicator Variation in number of natural spatial units by ecosystems (Andean forest in fluvial erosional mountain, Sub-Andean forest in fluvial erosional mountain and Basal forest in fluvial erosional mountain), in its attribute, Heterogeneity, it is considered Desirable when, it is maintained or increased and Not Desirable when it decreases in relation to the previous period. 2) In the indicator Variation in the number of fragments of a natural spatial unit, in the attribute Spatial configuration, it is considered Desirable when it is maintained or increased and Not Desirable when it decreases in relation to the previous period. 3) In the indicator Variation of the size of the largest fragment of the spatial unit, in the attribute Spatial configuration, it is considered Desirable when the size of the fragment is maintained and increased and Not Desirable when the size of the largest fragment of the natural unit decreases by at least 10%. 4) In the indicator Variation in the number of areas transformed by agricultural activities and illicit crops, in the attribute Spatial configuration, it is considered Desirable when it is maintained or decreased, and Not Desirable when it increases. 5) In the indicator Variation in connectivity between fragments of natural spatial units, for the Continuity attribute, it is considered Desirable if it is positive and Not Desirable when it is negative. 6) In the indicator Variation in the longitudinal continuity of natural spatial units, in the attribute Continuity, it is considered Desirable if it is negative, and Not Desirable when it is positive. 7) The indicator Variation in altitudinal continuity between natural spatial units, in the attribute Continuity, is considered Desirable when it is positive and Not Desirable when it is negative. In the monitoring program (2021) of land covers, indicators and thresholds were defined: 1) In the Indicator Variation in number of natural spatial units by ecosystems (Andean forest in fluvial erosional mountain, Sub-Andean forest in fluvial erosional mountain and Basal forest in fluvial erosional mountain), in its attribute, Heterogeneity, it is considered Desirable when, it is maintained or increased and Not Desirable when it decreases in relation to the previous period. 2) In the indicator Variation in the number of fragments of a natural spatial unit, in the attribute Spatial configuration, it is considered Desirable when it is maintained or increased and Not Desirable when it decreases in relation to the previous period. 3) In the indicator Variation of the size of the largest fragment of the spatial unit, in the attribute Spatial configuration, it is considered Desirable when the size of the fragment is maintained and increased and Not Desirable when the size of the largest fragment of the natural unit decreases by at least 10%. 4) In the indicator Variation in the number of areas transformed by agricultural activities and illicit crops, in the attribute Spatial configuration, it is considered Desirable when it is maintained or decreased, and Not Desirable when it increases. 5) In the indicator Variation in connectivity between fragments of natural spatial units, for the Continuity attribute, it is considered Desirable if it is positive and Not Desirable when it is negative. 6) In the indicator Variation in the longitudinal continuity of natural spatial units, in the attribute Continuity, it is considered Desirable if it is negative, and Not Desirable when it is positive. 7) The indicator Variation in altitudinal continuity between natural spatial units, in the attribute Continuity, is considered Desirable when it is positive and Not Desirable when it is negative.
2) Sub-Andean forest in fluvial-erosional mountains: For the period analyzed (2019 - 2022) there are few changes in natural vegetation cover, which maintain high ecological integrity, allowing the structure, composition and functionality of the biomes to be dynamic under natural conditions, allowing the mobility of biotic components and the flow of energy and nutrients, while at the same time connecting with other protected areas that make up a conservation corridor.
- Basal forest in fluvial erosional mountain
3) Basal forest in fluvial-erosional mountains: Medium and Low.
In the monitoring program (2021) of land covers, indicators and thresholds were defined: 1) In the Indicator Variation in number of natural spatial units by ecosystems (Andean forest in fluvial erosional mountain, Sub-Andean forest in fluvial erosional mountain and Basal forest in fluvial erosional mountain), in its attribute, Heterogeneity, it is considered Desirable when, it is maintained or increased and Not Desirable when it decreases in relation to the previous period. 2) In the indicator Variation in the number of fragments of a natural spatial unit, in the attribute Spatial configuration, it is considered Desirable when it is maintained or increased and Not Desirable when it decreases in relation to the previous period. 3) In the indicator Variation of the size of the largest fragment of the spatial unit, in the attribute Spatial configuration, it is considered Desirable when the size of the fragment is maintained and increased and Not Desirable when the size of the largest fragment of the natural unit decreases by at least 10%. 4) In the indicator Variation in the number of areas transformed by agricultural activities and illicit crops, in the attribute Spatial configuration, it is considered Desirable when it is maintained or decreased, and Not Desirable when it increases. 5) In the indicator Variation in connectivity between fragments of natural spatial units, for the Continuity attribute, it is considered Desirable if it is positive and Not Desirable when it is negative. 6) In the indicator Variation in the longitudinal continuity of natural spatial units, in the attribute Continuity, it is considered Desirable if it is negative, and Not Desirable when it is positive. 7) The indicator Variation in altitudinal continuity between natural spatial units, in the attribute Continuity, is considered Desirable when it is positive and Not Desirable when it is negative. In the monitoring program (2021) of land covers, indicators and thresholds were defined: 1) In the Indicator Variation in number of natural spatial units by ecosystems (Andean forest in fluvial erosional mountain, Sub-Andean forest in fluvial erosional mountain and Basal forest in fluvial erosional mountain), in its attribute, Heterogeneity, it is considered Desirable when, it is maintained or increased and Not Desirable when it decreases in relation to the previous period. 2) In the indicator Variation in the number of fragments of a natural spatial unit, in the attribute Spatial configuration, it is considered Desirable when it is maintained or increased and Not Desirable when it decreases in relation to the previous period. 3) In the indicator Variation of the size of the largest fragment of the spatial unit, in the attribute Spatial configuration, it is considered Desirable when the size of the fragment is maintained and increased and Not Desirable when the size of the largest fragment of the natural unit decreases by at least 10%. 4) In the indicator Variation in the number of areas transformed by agricultural activities and illicit crops, in the attribute Spatial configuration, it is considered Desirable when it is maintained or decreased, and Not Desirable when it increases. 5) In the indicator Variation in connectivity between fragments of natural spatial units, for the Continuity attribute, it is considered Desirable if it is positive and Not Desirable when it is negative. 6) In the indicator Variation in the longitudinal continuity of natural spatial units, in the attribute Continuity, it is considered Desirable if it is negative, and Not Desirable when it is positive. 7) The indicator Variation in altitudinal continuity between natural spatial units, in the attribute Continuity, is considered Desirable when it is positive and Not Desirable when it is negative.
3) Erosional fluvial mountain basal forest: For the period analyzed (2019 - 2022) there are mainly anthropogenic impacts resulting from historical human intervention activities (UOT) prior to the declaration of the park. Dysfunctions in composition and functionality are concentrated in this ecosystem and become more noticeable due to the edge effect produced by the drastic changes in vegetation cover outside the park boundaries towards agricultural and urban areas. However, the results show that in 2020 the number of transformed areas decreased with respect to 2019 but then returned to the same conditions in 2022, which requires a more detailed analysis and a more rigorous comparison in the next monitoring periods.
2. Ecosystem Service Values
MONITORING OF VALUES
THRESHOLDS OF SUCCESS
CONDITION OF VALUES
SUMMARY OF TRENDS AND RESULTS
1) Water resource provision service. -Middle Caquetá watershed: Supplies San José del Fragua, Albania and Valparaíso. - Pescado watershed: Supplies Belén de los Andaquíes. During October and December 2016, in San José del Fragua (Caquetá, Colombia), a study on the identification of aquatic macroinvertebrate biodiversity was conducted. A total of 1357 individuals distributed in 13 orders and 36 families were found; the order Trichoptera is the most diverse with nine families. The biological quality of the water was determined by implementing the bmwp/Col index, which yielded results of good water quality (Class I).
The Protected Area does not have information on the condition of the identified ecosystem services.
The Protected Area does not have success thresholds for the ecosystem services identified.
The Protected Area does not have information on the trend and results of identified ecosystem services.
2) Climate regulation service and food provision. - Carbon sink: According to the PNNC Carbon Atlas (2020), the PNN contains 73,653.4 hectares of forest that constitute a reservoir of 25,713,86.2 tCO2e of carbon. In addition, the natural regeneration of natural vegetation from 1990 to 2019 has been quantified at 207.2 ha that generate 72,546.6 tCO2e in carbon sequestration. - Food for local communities: A list of species recorded in three sectors of the Park was constructed and developed between April and December 2018. A total of 20 species of hunting use belonging to the class Mammalia (17 species) and Birds (3 species) were recorded. Of the species recorded it was found that 3 of them are in vulnerable category (VU) and one in critical status (CR) according to resolution 1912 of 2017 for Colombia and according to the IUCN global classification, 13 were in least concern (LC), 5 in vulnerable status (VU) and one near threatened (NT).
The Protected Area does not have information on the condition of the identified ecosystem services.
The Protected Area does not have success thresholds for the ecosystem services identified.
The Protected Area does not have information on the trend and results of identified ecosystem services.
3) Identity-building service (cultural, spiritual and religious): According to the Inga people, well-preserved or pristine forests provide support and spiritual strength for ancestral and fundamental practices such as traditional medicine.
The Protected Area does not have information on the condition of the identified ecosystem services.
The Protected Area does not have success thresholds for the ecosystem services identified.
The Protected Area does not have information on the trend and results of identified ecosystem services.
3. Cultural Values
MONITORING OF VALUES
THRESHOLDS OF SUCCESS
CONDITION OF VALUES
SUMMARY OF TRENDS AND RESULTS
1) Protection of natural elements associated with the permanence of knowledge and cultural diversity of the Ingano people, such as plant species for medicinal use.
The Protected Area does not have information on the condition of cultural values.
The Protected Area does not have information on thresholds of success for cultural values.
The Protected Area does not have information on the trend and results of cultural values.

Conservation Summary

Good Governance
The governance of the Alto Fragua Indi Wasi National Natural Park is characterized by a participatory structure that integrates diverse local communities, highlighting the fundamental role of the Inga indigenous communities. The declaration of the PNN was an initiative of the Inga people of Caquetá (Resguardos Yurayaco, San Miguel, Brisas, Niñeras and Agua Blanca Cozumbe), who recognised the ancestral nature of their territory in the resolution. In 2002, the Inter-administrative Agreement for the Coordination of the Public Function of Conservation and Management of the Protected Area was signed, which includes an annual work plan with the Inga people to promote intercultural management of the park. This agreement, which is in force and has no termination date, establishes two coordinating bodies: the steering committee and the local committee. Since 2005, PNN Alto Fragua Indi Wasi has made progress in characterizing the social aspects of families that partially or fully overlap with the protected area. From 2016 onwards, transitional agreements for participatory ecological restoration have been signed with the farming community, who engage in economic activities that transform areas of dense forest or secondary vegetation for temporary or permanent crops or grazing. As of 2024, 201 voluntary restoration agreements have been formalized, with 54 still active. In 2019, the prior consultation process with the Inga people was formalized with agreements that include an action plan to guide and prioritize compliance over five years. In 2023, two interadministrative agreements were signed with the Tandachiridu Inganakuna Indigenous Association to support the implementation and monitoring of these agreements. The park’s governance is strengthened through strategic alliances with governmental institutions and non-governmental organizations, ensuring a robust framework for long-term conservation.

Design and Planning
The design and planning of Alto Fragua Indi Wasi National Natural Park have integrated both ecological and social considerations, ensuring a holistic approach to area conservation. The park’s management instruments include well-defined zoning, with areas designated for strict protection and zones for sustainable use, balancing biodiversity conservation with local development. However, it is crucial to update these plans to incorporate new scientific data and address emerging threats such as climate change and land use pressure. Additionally, there is a need to enhance the technical capacity of park staff to improve the implementation of conservation strategies. Attention to land use, occupation, and tenure with vulnerable farming communities has helped maintain high ecological integrity of the protected area. Socioeconomic and environmental characterization of farming families has been a key factor in advancing management measures, such as passive ecological restoration agreements and sanitation, covering 773.3217 hectares in conservation and 199.9458 hectares in passive restoration process. Coordination with the Inga people of Caquetá, through prior consultation agreements, not only guarantees their rights but also incorporates cultural codes into the management of the protected area, laying the groundwork for the development of the Special Management Register (REM) and joint resource management for the implementation of conservation measures.

Effective Management
Effective management of PNN Alto Fragua Indi Wasi is based on a robust system of prevention, surveillance, and control designed to address the various pressures affecting its conservation values, enabling the planning and execution of strategic actions to prevent, mitigate, and control threats. The established protocol includes a comprehensive analysis of pressures and threats, defines specific actions that are actively being implemented through surveillance tours by park staff, and utilizes technological tools for managing violations in accordance with current regulations. The implementation of the Prevention, Surveillance, and Control Protocol for PNN Alto Fragua Indi Wasi is organized into several stages, from its formulation to the evaluation of effectiveness. Key actions include: 1. Environmental Education: Educational activities are carried out for various local actors, enhancing awareness and community commitment to park conservation. Initiatives such as “paint the park,” environmental film clubs, and educational talks, coordinated with PRAES IER El Vergel – Bioindi and María Auxiliadora, are prominent in this area. 2. Collaborative Surveillance: Surveillance tours are conducted in collaboration with PNN Cueva de los Guácharos and members of the Inga people of Caquetá, promoting a collaborative approach that increases the effectiveness of area management. Cooperation with local communities, especially the Inga people, has been essential, creating joint routes that highlight the cultural importance of the park and reduce pressure on the protected area. 3. Monitoring and Control: In 2023, satellite images were used to monitor changes in land cover, complementing field actions. Sanctioning procedures have been implemented for environmental violations, with preventive measures and referrals to territorial authorities for proper management. 4. Transparency and Participation: The National Parks website provides detailed information on park management, including regulations, ecosystems, fauna, flora, and environmental services, ensuring transparency and informed participation of stakeholders. This comprehensive and collaborative approach not only strengthens park management but also fosters local community involvement in conservation and area management.

Conservation Results
The Alto Fragua Indi Wasi National Natural Park (PNN AFIW) exhibits notable ecological integrity in its forest coverage, with 96% of its total area showing very high and high levels of integrity. This integrity encompasses various vegetation types, including the Andean Forest in Fluvio-Erosional Mountain, the Sub-Andean Forest in Fluvio-Erosional Mountain, and the Basal Forest in Fluvio-Erosional Mountain. Only 4% of the area shows very low, low, or medium levels of integrity. Conservation results in the park have been positive, with the preservation of critical habitats and protection of endangered species such as the tapir, the spectacled bear, and the harpy eagle. The continuous presence of these emblematic species indicates that the implemented conservation strategies are having a positive impact. Successful efforts in restoring degraded areas and promoting sustainable resource use practices among local communities are also highlighted. However, significant challenges remain, such as the need for more effective monitoring of biodiversity changes and mitigating threats like illegal activities and agricultural expansion. Regarding the preservation and disturbance indices of PNN AFIW, the period from 2002 to 2019 reports that 98.7% of the area is in a stable state, with 75,247.6 hectares. Only 0.1% of the area is under pressure, with 92.1 hectares; 0.4% is in a recovery state, with 328.4 hectares; and 0.7% is in a transformation state, with 542.5 hectares. These data reflect a generally positive balance in park management, although ongoing efforts are required to address persistent challenges.

Site Visit
The visit to Alto Fragua Indi Wasi National Natural Park (PNN) highlighted significant advancements in governance, planning, and park management despite existing challenges. The solid progress and commitment of officials to ecological and cultural conservation in the region were evident. The park’s role in supporting sustainable production processes outside the protected area contributes to both internal conservation and the well-being of local communities. The park’s initiatives provide direct benefits to local farming and indigenous communities in the area of influence. These benefits include key ecosystem services such as water provision for human settlements and the aesthetic and recreational value of landscapes, even though their economic value is not quantified. The relationship between the park and local communities is based on mutual respect, effective communication, and a shared interest in preserving nature, reinforcing the park’s role in the IUCN Green List Program. During the visit, the property of María Nelly Pérez in the Fragua Chorroso Sector was strategically selected for interviews with stakeholders. This site, one of the few easily accessible, is key to closely observing conservation and restoration activities led by the park, including land use management, ecological restoration, and projects such as “Protected Areas and Peace.” These initiatives integrate training in non-timber forest products, community monitoring, and sustainable production systems, reflecting a comprehensive approach to biodiversity conservation. The presence of a farmer delegate from the municipality of Belén de los Andaquíes provided a broader perspective on conservation processes in the region, highlighting the importance of consulting local actors to better understand the impact of conservation initiatives. Despite logistical challenges, park officials demonstrate a high level of commitment to communities, promoting both ecosystem services and environmental education, and fostering strong community engagement in conservation. The interview with the Women Weavers Association, Warmi Adawurkuna, revealed how the park supports the Inga people’s economic initiatives, especially in craft production. Since 2017, the park has supported these activities, which not only strengthen the local economy but also preserve the culture and ancestry of the Inga people. This approach is crucial for the park’s conservation objectives and underscores its commitment to equity and equality in benefit distribution. At the headquarters of the Cabildo Mayor of the Tandachiridu Inganokuna Association, the importance of prior consultation and adherence to the agreements established in the protected area management plan was emphasized. This Association, which groups the five Inga resguardos of Caquetá, has played a fundamental role in conserving the park’s mountains, promoting governance schemes that allow indigenous participation in conservation processes. In conclusion, the Alto Fragua Indi Wasi National Natural Park (PNN AFIW) stands out as an exemplary model of conservation based on active participation and stakeholder consultation. This integrative approach combines ecological protection with cultural strengthening, demonstrating that ongoing collaboration between the park and local communities is crucial for successful conservation of protected areas and for strengthening socio-environmental links. The park represents a model of sustainable and adaptive management, capable of addressing current and future challenges. It is gratifying to see how the relationship between the park and the communities in its area of influence is based on mutual respect, effective communication, and a shared interest in preserving nature and associated ecological and cultural values. This recognition of the value of nature’s contributions to society reinforces the park’s role in the Green List Program, highlighting its commitment to inclusive and participatory conservation. Furthermore, building alliances with peasant communities and indigenous organizations in the area of influence not only improves the conservation status of the protected area, but also significantly reduces operational costs compared to an approach based solely on control and surveillance. This collaborative strategy has proven to be more effective and sustainable in the long term. We would like to congratulate the park staff, from its director to its officers and contractors, who, with their daily dedication, have shown a strong commitment to the protection of the area and the wellbeing of the local communities, both peasant and indigenous. Their work together makes conservation a shared responsibility and ensures that its benefits are a right accessible to all.

Public Stakeholder Consultation
The public consultation with stakeholders was conducted through a Google form, available from August 12 to August 20, exceeding the 30-day period stipulated in the User Manual. This survey was promoted on the websites of IUCN South America and Colombia’s National Natural Parks (PNN). The management of the form was the responsibility of an EAGL representative, who reviewed the responses and shared the results with the other experts. A total of 29 responses were received from stakeholders from various sectors, demonstrating a strong commitment to the conservation of the protected area. Participants included students, teachers, representatives from mayor’s offices, NGOs, non-governmental organizations, as well as members of peasant and indigenous communities, reflecting the wide range of stakeholders interested in the PNN Alto Fragua Indi Wasi. NGOs and environmental groups, which represented 31.03% of respondents, stood out for their collaboration in the conservation of the park and the recognition of indigenous traditional knowledge. Organizations such as Conservation International, Amazon Conservation Team, and Fundación Tierra Viva have played a crucial role in this area. The academic sector, also accounting for 31.03% of respondents, included teachers and researchers who have collaborated on educational and research projects related to the area. Institutions such as the University of Cauca and the University of the Amazon have emphasized the importance of cooperation with the park to strengthen knowledge and biodiversity conservation. The local community, representing 24.14% of respondents, demonstrated a diversity of ties with the park, highlighting the importance of the park for indigenous and peasant communities, who actively collaborate in conservation and mutually benefit from its management. The public sector, represented by 7%, included authorities from the mayor’s offices of San José del Fragua and Belén de los Andaquíes, who highlighted the support of the National Natural Parks of Colombia in environmental education and natural resource protection. The agricultural and tourism sectors, each representing 3.45%, emphasized the importance of collaboration in sustainable agricultural practices and rural tourism development, respectively. In conclusion, the overall assessment of PNN Alto Fragua Indi Wasi is positive, highlighting its role as an environmental authority and its commitment to conservation, environmental education, and sustainable development. Despite challenges such as its remote location and budget constraints, the park has consolidated its purpose thanks to collaboration with local communities, NGOs, and academia. It is recommended to continue supporting conservation programs, especially in the face of emerging threats such as agricultural expansion and climate change. Inclusion in the Green List of Protected and Conserved Areas could further strengthen its management, facilitating international collaboration and access to additional resources.

Recommendations
As with any protected area, there is always potential for enhancing infrastructure, whether through upgrading facilities, expanding the fleet of vehicles, improving monitoring equipment, or optimizing staff management practices. Expanding the headquarters could provide greater comfort for staff, ensure better-equipped facilities for data analysis and monitoring activities, and accommodate additional vehicles and machinery in the future.
The EAGL recommends documenting the park’s numerous experiences in supporting communities and collaboration with governmental and non-governmental entities. This documentation will not only provide valuable evidence for future recertification processes but also serve as a foundation for new projects that could enhance employment opportunities within the protected area. By addressing these areas, the park can continue to advance its mission of conservation and sustainable development, while fostering stronger partnerships and community engagement.

Please note that our website is in a BETA phase and is still undergoing final testing before our official launch.
IUCN Green List

IUCN Green List
Protected | Conserved Areas


Subscribe to our mailing list

Privacy Policy Legal Sitemap

© 2026 IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature
Site by Design Factory
This website is possible thanks to the support from:

Join the conversation


IUCN Green List